Legal Opinion
Holgar Meyer v. Intrepid Credit Union
District Court, D. Montana
Decided November 5, 2025No. 6:25-cv-00037Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION HOLGAR MEYER, CV-25-37-H-BMM Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER ON INTREPID CREDIT UNION, MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. INTRODUCTION Intrepid Credit Union (“Intrepid”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Holgar Meyer’s (“Meyer”) putative class action complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 8.) Meyer alleges violations of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act of 1978 (“EFTA”) and Regulation E in the complaint. (Doc. 1.) Meyer also alleges a claim for unjust enrichment against Intrepid in the alternative. (Id.)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.