United States v. Paul D. Wood
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1DissentTacha, Circuit Judge
In this appeal, we address Paul Wood’s challenge to the sufficiency of his indictment. A criminal indictment must safeguard two constitutional guarantees: “the Sixth Amendment right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation in order to prepare a defense; and the Fifth Amendment protection against twice being placed in jeopardy for the identical offense.” United States v. Russo, 527 F.2d 1051, 1058 (10th Cir.1975) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 906, 96 S.Ct. 2226, 48 L.Ed.2d 831 (1976). An indictment conforms to these minimal constitutional standards when…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.