Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Paul D. Wood

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1993No. 92-2172Published

1DissentTacha, Circuit Judge

In this appeal, we address Paul Wood’s challenge to the sufficiency of his indictment. A criminal indictment must safeguard two constitutional guarantees: “the Sixth Amendment right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation in order to prepare a defense; and the Fifth Amendment protection against twice being placed in jeopardy for the identical offense.” United States v. Russo, 527 F.2d 1051, 1058 (10th Cir.1975) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 906, 96 S.Ct. 2226, 48 L.Ed.2d 831 (1976). An indictment conforms to these minimal constitutional standards when…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API