Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 13, 1925PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Action for personal injuries received at a railroad crossing near Fort Smith, Arkansas. The cause of action as stated in the amended petition upon which it was tried, is one under Arkansas statutes as the same have been construed by the Supreme Court of Arkansas. The statutes and the rulings of the court are all specifically pleaded. Plaintiff was riding in an automobile, owned and driven by another. In other words, she was a mere passenger or guest in the automobile. The material portion of the petition reads :

“That said defendant was at all the times hereináfter mentioned the owner of and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Barringer v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Huddleston v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Maurizi v. Western Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Hopkins v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Ramey v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Buhler v. MaddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Mosely v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API