Legal Opinion

Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. Huffaker

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1922No. 2580PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

Appellant asserts that the loss of the fingers and a part of the palm of the hand, leaving the thumb and about one-half of the palm -next to the thumb not injured or affected, does not amount to the total loss of the use of the hand, and the injury would fall under the schedule of compensation for the specific injuries to the fingers and metacarpal bones provided for in the Employers’ Liability Act (article 5246—21, pt. 1). The injury suffered by the employee was as is described above. There is no evidence from a vocational point of view that the extent of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BoudreauxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Claim of Carkey v. Island Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Claim of Adams v. Boorum & Pease Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. Claim of Barringer v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API