Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Shamrock Casualty Co. & Mack
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurray H. Pearlmaw, J.
The parties hereto, in lieu of the trial of the issues raised on a special proceeding by petitioner for a permanent stay of arbitration, resorted to the simplified procedure provided for by CPLR 3031 et seq. The facts, as stipulated in the submission and at a pretrial conference held pursuant to CPLR 3035, are as follows:
On February 1, 1967, respondent, hereinafter referred to as claimant, was driving a taxicab owned by his employer, Harmel Cab Corp., which is insured by the petitioner. , While stopped at a traffic light, he was struck in the rear by a vehicle owned and operated by Oscar…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosenthal v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Norcross v. . WillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- First National Bank v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Gavin v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Billings v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State Farm County Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas v. LandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Friend v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. SelleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.