Legal Opinion

Parker v. Vista Construction Concepts, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 10, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs.

In our opinion, the plaintiff subcontractors, notwithstanding their failure to obtain a home improvement license, may enforce their contract against the defendant contractor, since the purpose of the requirement of a license is to "safeguard and protect the home owner” (Administrative Code of City of New York § B32-350.0; see also, Rosasco Creameries v Cohen, 276 NY 274, 280; 12 NY Jur 2d, Business and Occupations, § 43; cf. Zimmett v Professional Acoustics, 103 Misc 2d 971). We do not construe the term, "owner”, as used in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Zimmett v. Professional Acoustics Ltd.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marketing Specialists, Inc. v. BruniDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1989
  2. Jack A. Corcoran Marble Co. v. Clark Construction Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API