Legal Opinion

United States v. Nix

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 25, 2017No. 6:14-CR-06181 EAWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States. District Judge

I. Introduction

Presently before the Court is a motion filed by defendants Earl McCoy (“McCoy”) and Matthew Nix (collectively, “Defendants”) seeking reconsideration- of the Court’s Decision and Order, dated August 24, 2017, in which the Court'denied Defendants’ motions for a new trial, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33,. to the extent that those motions were based on Juror No. 3’s alleged bias. (See Dkt. 385-1). Defendants request a new evidentiary hearing concerning Juror No. 3’s qualifications to serve on the jury, recusal of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. In Re Health Management Systems, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API