State Ex Rel. Arthur v. Proctor
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
There are two separate questions to be determined here: (1) Is the proper venue in this case in Dane county ? (2) Does a writ of mandamus lie to compel a court to exercise its jurisdiction?(1) The venue for a criminal case is the county where the offense was committed. Sec. 356.01, Stats. The offense in this action was the filing of a false corporation income-tax return. The superior court held that the offense was committed in Columbia county.where the accused made out the return. The state contends that the offense was committed in Dane county where the return was required to be filed. It…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. T. L. Smith Co. v. Superior Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Maloney v. ProctorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. HunterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Natural Resources v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District IVWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Marachowsky v. KerlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. FriedlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. KoopmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Wisconsin Area Health & Welfare Fund v. CateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.