Legal Opinion
Gist v. Stamforpd Hospital District
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 13, 1977No. 5090PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER, Justice.
B. J. Gist, Lem Ruark and Anita Harvey MacGregor filed their petition for a declaratory judgment complaining of the Stamford Hospital District and its Board of Directors, Sam Baize, A. C. Humphrey, A. J. Mills, Don Rose, Eugene Swenson, Eugene Watts, and Earl Smith, and the Attorney General of Texas seeking to have Senate Bill # 450, being Chapter 563 of the regular session of the 63rd Legislature authorizing the expansion of the Stamford Hospital District, declared null and void and unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. They also…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hovey v. ShepherdTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Cochran County v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. PribbleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Crane v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. City of SweetwaterTexas Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Bohn v. WaddellArizona Tax Court · 1990
- S.O.C. Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Sachse, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Caudle v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979