Opinion No. 69-207 (1969) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Parole — Consideration — Time Split sentences are not presently authorized by Oklahoma law, and any language in a Judgment and Sentence issued since the repeal of 22 O.S. 991 [22-991] (1961), as amended by ch. 333, O.S.L. 1963, and by ch. 196, O.S.L. 1965, should be treated as surplusage and disregarded. The provisions of 57 O.S. 332.7 [57-332.7] (1961), relating to consideration for parole upon completion of one-third (1/3) of a sentence, are applicable only to the full tenn of any split sentence given when split sentences were authorized. The Attorney General has had under consideration…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
- Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Cote v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
- Petition of LeaserCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.