Legal Opinion

Opinion No. 69-207 (1969) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 21, 1969Published

1Opinion of the Court

Parole — Consideration — Time Split sentences are not presently authorized by Oklahoma law, and any language in a Judgment and Sentence issued since the repeal of 22 O.S. 991 [22-991] (1961), as amended by ch. 333, O.S.L. 1963, and by ch. 196, O.S.L. 1965, should be treated as surplusage and disregarded. The provisions of 57 O.S. 332.7 [57-332.7] (1961), relating to consideration for parole upon completion of one-third (1/3) of a sentence, are applicable only to the full tenn of any split sentence given when split sentences were authorized. The Attorney General has had under consideration…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Stevens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Cote v. CummingsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  5. Petition of LeaserCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API