Legal Opinion
United States Cold Storage Corp. v. Detroit Board of Assessors
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1957No. Calendar 47,190PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Petitioner, United States Cold Storage Corporation, seeks a writ of mandamus or prohibition to compel the board of assessors of the city of Detroit to comply with the provisions of subdivision 14 of section 9 of PA 1956, No 206.*
Petitioner shows that it owns and operates a warehouse in the city of Detroit; that in December, 1956, it had stored in its warehouse certain farm products; that respondent, in disregard of the exemptions noted in the above act, has included said farm products in its assessment roll; that on February 7, *84Í957, t^e board of assessors of the city of Detroit wrote a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Michigan Baptist Homes & Development Co. v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Harry B. Helmsley v. City of Detroit, Michigan, a Municipal Corporation of the State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Frost-Pack Distributing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.