Legal Opinion

Geil v. Stevens

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874No. 4,148PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Thomas Watson was Sheriff of Monterey County. The defendant Stevens procured ¿a writ of attachment against the property of one Billings, which was placed in the hands of Watson, as Sheriff, on the 3d day of December, 1869. He attached horses and mules, and charged keeper’s fees, and the expenses of feeding the animals in a stable.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Thomas Watson was Sheriff of Monterey County. The defendant Stevens procured ¿a writ of attachment against the property of one Billings, which was placed in the hands of Watson, as Sheriff, on the 3d day of December, 1869. He attached horses and mules, and charged keeper’s fees, and the expenses of feeding the animals in a stable. His bill for these services was assigned to the plaintiff, who brought this action to recover the same. No certificate was procured from the Court that the charges were…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court :

By the statute (Sec. 2,803 Hitt. Gen. Laws) the Sheriff is allowed certain designated fees, and he is also allowed “such further compensation for his trouble and expense in taking possession of property under an attachment or execution, or other process, and preserving the same as the Court from which the writ or order may issue shall certify to be just and reasonable.” We think that in the absence of the required certificate, the Sheriff is entitled to nothing more than the fees enumerated in the statute, and cannot legally claim the “further compensation” sought to be…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shumway v. LeakeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. United States v. Spokane Dry Goods Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1920
  3. First National Bank of Stevens Point v. KickbuschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lane v. McElhanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Nash v. MuldoonNevada Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API