Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hilly v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1926No. 9457Published

The opinion states the case.

1Concurrence

HAWKINS, Judge.

I concur with my brother Lattimore in his view that no reversible error was committed by the trial judge in refusing to grant appellant’s motion to withdraw his announcement and continue the case on account of surprise at the testimony of the witness Turrentine. The case had been continued one time by appellant on account of the absence of this witness. On additional process to Brazoria County by appellant he had not been served. On the 14th day of February the district attorney had process re-issued for all witnesses both for the state and accused and process for Turrentine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marta and Bonado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API