Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance & Coping
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 21, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*500Respondent Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company brought this proceeding to stay an arbitration proceeding commenced by appellant James Coping to recover uninsured motorist benefits under a policy issued by Metropolitan. Appellant Coping claims damages for injuries allegedly sustained when he was a passenger in a vehicle owned by proposed additional respondent Mulugeta T. Tesfai, which was struck by a vehicle owned by proposed additional respondent Victor Amparo. Metropolitan insured Tesfai’s car. Proposed additional respondent Eagle Insurance Co. allegedly insured Amparo’s car.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. StekardisNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Aaer Sprayed Insulations, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Jones-BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Troiano v. Otsego Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. HancockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Arbitration between Propulsora Ixtapa Sur, S.A. De C.V. & Omni Hotels Franchising Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & KankamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004