Legal Opinion

In re Miller & Brown (2)

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1905No. 549Published

In Bankruptcy. Sur petition of Pollock & Caskel for order on trustee to turn over property.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The general principles which govern in cases of this character have been discussed in disposing of the petition of the Magee Carpet Co., 135 Fed. 868, and do not need to be repeated here. The facts upon which the case turns are not disputed. About October 1,1904, in the absence of Mr. Brown, the member of the firm who did the buying, Mr. Pollock, one of the petitioners, called at the store of the bankrupts in Lewisburg, Pa., and solicited an order for ribbons. Mr. Miller, the other member of the firm, who was present, authorized the young lady in charge of that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Hunt v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Hickman v. ShimpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. In re Miller & Brown (1)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Reber v. SchitlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API