Legal Opinion · Dissent

DiMichel v. South Buffalo Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991Published

1Dissent

Balio and Lawton, JJ. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent. Surveillance tapes or films taken of the plaintiff for the purpose of use at trial constitute material prepared solely for litigation and enjoy a conditional privilege from disclosure (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [2]; Greene v Lee, 112 AD2d 140). In the instant case, plaintiff failed to show factually that he has a "substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the case” and that he "is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means” (CPLR 3101 [d] [2]; emphases added), and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. Coastal Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Greene v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API