Legal Opinion

State v. Loring

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2002No. Nos. 02-AP-068, 02-AP-070, 02-AP-071, and 02-AP-072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moyer, CJ.

{¶ 1} Dane Chavers, counsel for defendants Chad Loring, William Crowder, Brandon Pack, and Sylvester Drafton, has filed four affidavits seeking the disqualification of Judge Deborah O’Neill from further proceedings regarding the above-captioned cases. Affiant also seeks Judge O’Neill’s disqualification from all future cases assigned to Judge O’Neill in which he is counsel of record.

{¶ 2} On July 22, 2002, Judge O’Neill forwarded an entry indicating that another public defender was assigned, in place of affiant, to represent the defendant in State v. Chad Loring. The substitution of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MackeyOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Disqualification of O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. Desellems, Unpublished Decision (8-22-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API