Murguiondo v. Nowland's
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Chancery Court of the city of Richmond on a motion to admit a will to ■ probate. Judgment for the executor. One of the defendants assigns error.
1Opinion of the Court
Keith, P.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
Robert E. Macomber, named as executor in a certain paper wilting dated March, 1810, offered it for probate in the chancery court of the city of Richmond as the last will and testament of Betti'e W. Rowlan. All of the parties interested in the probate were summoned to appear before the court, a jury was asked for and impaneled, and the testimony of the subscribing witnesses having been introduced, Mary de Murguiondo, one of the parties contesting the will, demurred to the evidence; but the court overruled the demurrer and 'entered a judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waller v. WallerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1845
- Warwick v. WarwickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
- Ramsey v. Ramsey's ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
- Meads v. EarleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Dinning v. DinningSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Black v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hamlet v. HamletSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
- Stone v. HoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Hall v. BrigstockeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.