Matter of City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1918, which affirmed a determination of the public service commission for the first district directing that, under section 90 of the Railroad Law, East Two Hundred and Thirty-eighth street should, cross above the grade of the railroad tracks and directing construction of a bridge for that purpose.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 31, 1918, which affirmed a determination of the public service commission for the first district directing that, under section 90 of the Railroad Law, East Two Hundred and Thirty-eighth street should, cross above the grade of the railroad tracks and directing construction of a bridge for that purpose. The railroads contended that the commission, under the circumstances, had no right to fasten upon the railroad companies any part of the expense of constructing the…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cudde-* back, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
2Cited by3 opinions
- McAneny v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- McAneny v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926