Legal Opinion

Bielecki v. City of Port Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1928No. 1633PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWabker, J.

The city of Port Arthur operates under a special charter authorizing it in specific terms-to “license, tax and regulate, or forbid and prevent, dancé houses * * * and suppress and close same, whenever the preservation of order, tranquillity, public safety or good morals may demand, or when necessary, expedient or advisable.” In general terms it authorizes the city “to define what shall be nuisances in the city, * * * and abate such nuisances by summary proceedings, and to punish the authors thereof by penalties, fines, and imprisonment.” Under authority of its charter, the city of Port Arthur…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. City of Austin v. Austin City Cemetery Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Town of Ascarate v. VillalobosTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of San Antonio v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Murphy v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. City of Bowling GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API