Legal Opinion

(SS) Baptista v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 23, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00844Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANNA MARIE BAPTISTA, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00844 JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION ) FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDER 13 v. ) DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN FAVOR ) OF DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) SECURITY, AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ANNA ) MARIE BAPTISTA 15 Defendant. ) ) 16 ) 17 Anna Marie Baptista asserts she is entitled to supplemental security income and disability 18 insurance benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API