Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1927No. 3 Div. 784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree and the extreme penalty of the law fixed by the jury.

No preliminary questions as to the sufficiency of venire are presented by the record or argued by counsel.

At the trial the state's evidence sufficiently established the corpus delicti and the venue in the county where the trial was had. The predicate was sufficient to admit declarations against interest or in the nature of confessions. The real conflict in the evidence was as to the character of the homicide. There was evidence by the state tending to show defendant's motive for the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. South & North Ala. Railroad v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. Gassenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. DeArman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bachelor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Pollard v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Birchfield v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Hayes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API