Legal Opinion

CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v. Cuomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Attorney General’s determinations were not affected by an error of law or arbitrary and capricious (CPLR 7803 [3]; see Matter of Madison Park Owner LLC v Schneiderman, 93 AD3d 555, 556 [1st Dept 2012]). Indeed, the Attorney General properly applied the common law in denying petitioner’s claim for contract reformation based on an alleged scrivener’s error (see *474e.g. Stonebridge Capital, LLC v Nomura Intl. PLC, 68 AD3d 546, 548 [1st Dept 2009], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 735 [2010]).

The court properly denied discovery in connection with the CPLR article 78 proceeding, as the material petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Levine v. Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API