Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 23, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The Defendant, Scott Anderson, appeals from his conviction of manslaughter, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 203(1)(A) (1980), after a jury trial in Superior Court (Cumberland County). The Defendant asserts that the Superior Court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of the blood test. He contends, first, that this blood test was taken in violation of 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 and should have been suppressed because there was no probable cause for arrest for operating under the influence and, second, that there was, in fact, no arrest made.

We deny the appeal and affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. ParkinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. State v. FoggSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. State v. DonahueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prokey v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. People v. KruegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. State v. LaPlanteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. State v. FoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  5. State v. CandageSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API