Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Lake Superior Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1953No. 29,031PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, J.

This is an original action seeking to prohibit the trial court from allowing attorney fees to a successful wife in an appeal in a divorce case by her unsuccessful husband. The rule is established in this state that such an order is proper. Cirtin v. Cirtin (1928), 199 Ind. 737, 164 N. E. 493; Cirtin v. Cirtin (1928), 87 Ind. App. 457, 161 N. E. 709. The petition should therefore be denied as to the principal point presented.

There is, however, a second question raised. The cause was tried before Hon. Edgar J. Call, as Special Judge of the Lake Superior Court,- Room No. 4, and, upon proper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cirtin v. CirtinIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cirtin v. CirtinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. State Ex Rel. v. Circuit Court of Huntington CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Inkoff v. InkoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Reger v. SUPERIOR COURT ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Copeland v. CopelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. State ex rel. Hert v. NiblackIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API