Legal Opinion

James Reeves, James A. Harrell, James B. Dean, Jr., and Others, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. Ray Wilkes

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 8, 1985No. 84-8022PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

In this employment discrimination case we must determine whether the district court erred in allowing intervention several years after entry of a consent decree and implementation of a remedial plan. Finding error, we reverse.

On March 24, 1978, James Reeves, a black male employed as a deputy sheriff in the Bibb County Sheriffs Department, commenced this litigation. On behalf of himself and all black deputy sheriffs then employed by the Bibb County Sheriffs Department and a class composed of all past, present, and future black applicants for employment, Reeves alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States of America, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of Chicago, William C. Bigby, and Ann Erwin, Intervening v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Howard v. McLucasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Paradise v. PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Michael D. Wright, Sr. v. State of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Olin Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API