Legal Opinion
In re New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Statewide Electric Utility Restructuring Plan
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 23, 1998No. 98-114PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
This is an interlocutory transfer without ruling requested by the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC) pursuant to RSA 365:20 (1995) and Supreme Court Rule 9. The questions presented, as modified at a pre-hearing evaluation conference, are as follows:
1. Does Public Service Company of New Hampshire have any rights under the Rate Agreement and/or RSA chapter 362-C which must be recognized by the public utilities commission in establishing stranded cost charges under RSA chapter 374-F?
2. If the answer to question #1 is “yes,” may the public utilities commission establish stranded cost…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Public Service Co. of New Hampshire v. PatchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Scott Paper Co. v. City of AnacortesWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Appeal of RichardsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Echo Consulting Services, Inc. v. North Conway BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- N.A.P.P. Realty Trust v. CC EnterprisesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Appeal of Campaign for Ratepayers RightsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001