Legal Opinion

In re Bevins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 16, 1908No. 34PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

December 33, 1906, at about noon, the firm of R. S. Bevins & Co., of Niagara Falls, delivered an assignment for the benefit of creditors to one Chamberlain, at Buffalo. The assignee told R. S. Bevins to go back to Niagara Falls and take possession of the business until he could get down and close it up. On the same *435day Philip Becker & Co., of Buffalo, creditors of Bevins & Co. to the amount of $408.02, obtained an attachment against their property on the ground that the indebtedness was fraudulently contracted, and that the assignment to Chamberlain was in fraud of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HornsteinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
  2. In re J. M. Mertens & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  3. In re WoodfordDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., Bankrupt-Appellant, and the Wurlitzer Company and Wurlitzer Acceptance Corporation, Petitioning CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. RothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. McDaniel Nat. Bank v. BridwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. Allegaert v. PerotDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. TarltonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API