Mead v. Bloom
New York Court of Appeals
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1DissentWachtler, J.
I disagree with the majority’s holding that plaintiff’s verdict must be reduced in accordance with section 15-108 of the General Obligations Law. Inasmuch as the settling defendant’s relationship to this litigation is one of vicarious liability only, the statute, which sets forth the consequences of a settlement by one of two or more joint tort-feasors, is inapplicable.
Plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision. Joined as defendants and treated as one unit for purposes of liability were the driver, Karen Bloom, and the owner, Maurice Bloom, of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- McDermott v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rock v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Felice v. St. Agnes HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.