Miller v. Universal Pictures Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Burke, J. (dissenting).
The majority would affirm a decision of the Appellate Division reversing Special and Trial Term and dismissing a complaint on the ground that where a licensor does not have “ property ” rights in an intellectual product, so far as the Copyright Act and the general rules of common law are concerned, he must show that the licensee expressly covenanted that it would not use the granted rights in media other than that in which rights are granted: In other words, from now on the scope of a grant in a license contract depends not on the parties ’ intention which is reflected…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n, Inc. v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Wagner-Nichols Recorder Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.