Legal Opinion

Seaward v. Tasker

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trial by court with jury. At the close of the evidence the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and reserved its decision on the motion of defendant to set the same aside.

1Opinion of the CourtScudder, J.

Upon the trial the evidence introduced consisted chiefly of a judgment roll, the printed cases on various appeals, and other court records. It being impossible to examine these records upon the trial, the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, and reserved its decision on the motion to set aside the verdict, in order that a thorough examination of the records might be made and the merits of the controversy determined. It was stipulated on the trial that if anything had not been admitted in evidence, which the court might re*571gard as material, it might be admitted in evidence at any time.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. . WigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Seaward v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Havana Central Railroad v. Knickerbocker Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Swarthout v. . RanierNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davis v. SeawardNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In re Rogers' EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1914
  3. Seaward v. TaskerNew York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API