Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1983No. 10-81-10393, 10-81-10394; CA A24366, CA A24367Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from judgments of conviction in two criminal cases consolidated for appeal. He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to state reasons on the record for the sentences imposed, as required by ORS 137.120(2). The state concedes that the trial court erred but argues that the error is not reviewable, because defendant did not raise the issue at trial and that the error was harmless. We reject the state’s arguments, because the trial court had no authority to impose sentences without complying with the mandatory terms of ORS 137.120(2); therefore, remand is necessary. State…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API