Legal Opinion

Casey v. American Export Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 15, 1949No. 74, Docket 21101PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment in favor of the plaintiff was affirmed in Casey v. American Export Lines, 2 Cir., 173 F.2d 324 but we directed that our mandate be withheld until the Supreme Court should decide the case of McAllister v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Company, 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 4, then pending on certiorari, 335 U.S. 870, 69 S.Ct. 167. The McAllister case was reversed on June 27, 1949 for the reason that a general agent under the standard form of agreement is not liable to a seaman injured by negligence of the officers or crew of a vessel owned-by the United States. 69 S.Ct. 1317. Consequently our decision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. McAllister v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Casey v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Harris J. Doucet v. Wheless Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Moore-M v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Gilroy v. Erie-Lackawanna RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. Richard T. Hawley v. Alaska Steamship Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API