Hempkin v. Bowmar
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SEVENTH DISTRICT, FOR THE PARISH OF OUACHITA, THE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT PRESIDING. This is an action on a promissory note, signed by defendant, Bowmar, for four thousand dollars, in which the plaintiff prayed for judgment; and also for an injunction to arrest an order of seizure and sale, obtained by Charles S. Abercrombie, of Natchez, against all the property of Bowmar, on his mortgage, to secure the sum of ten thousand one hundred and…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE SEVENTH DISTRICT, FOR THE PARISH OF OUACHITA, THE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT PRESIDING. This is an action on a promissory note, signed by defendant, Bowmar, for four thousand dollars, in which the plaintiff prayed for judgment; and also for an injunction to arrest an order of seizure and sale, obtained by Charles S. Abercrombie, of Natchez, against all the property of Bowmar, on his mortgage, to secure the sum of ten thousand one hundred and thirty-five dollars. The plaintiff alleges, that this mortgage was executed by Bowmar on the eve of insolvency, and to give an…
1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.
Plaintiff alleges, that he is a creditor of the defendant Bowmar, in the sum of three thousand five hundred and six dollars, on a note or due bill; that after said debt bad become due and demandable,said Bowmar, being in insolvent circumstances, fraudulently acknowledged himself to owe to the defendant, Abercrombie, the sum of ten thousand one hundred and thirty-five dollars, to secure which he executed, in favor of said Abercrombie, a conventional mortgage on his property ; by virtue of which, an executory process having issued, all the property mortgaged was seized and advertised for sale,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Rosenfield v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1869
- Phoenix Building & Homestead Ass'n v. WeilbacherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1914