Legal Opinion

Conner v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 29, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

Mark F. Conner appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, denying his petition for post-conviction review after an evidentiary hearing. Petitioner contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in the underlying jury trial and in his sentencing. We affirm the judgment.

I

On November 20, 1980, a jury found Mark Conner guilty of the murder of Anthony Piacentini. The facts of the case pertinent to this decision are summarized in State v. Conner, 434 A.2d 509 (Me.1981) as follows:

The elderly victim, Anthony Piacentini, worked in April, 1979, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ConnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Lang v. MurchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. True v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Kimball v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. State v. LovejoySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aldus v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. Tribou v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  3. Francis v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. Tribou v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API