Legal Opinion

People v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1985No. Crim. No. 13945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

—Defendant was charged with two counts of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). He moved to set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995) on the ground that a violation of the witness exclusion order at his preliminary examination denied him a substantial right. The court granted the motion and dismissed the information, despite an express finding that defendant was not prejudiced by the violation. The People appeal. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1).) (All further references to sections of an unspecified code are to the Penal Code.) We shall reverse the judgment of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States v. Thomas A. Warren, John L. Warren, Jr., Des. E. Schick and David DefinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. Pimentel CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API