People v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
—Defendant was charged with two counts of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). He moved to set aside the information (Pen. Code, § 995) on the ground that a violation of the witness exclusion order at his preliminary examination denied him a substantial right. The court granted the motion and dismissed the information, despite an express finding that defendant was not prejudiced by the violation. The People appeal. (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(1).) (All further references to sections of an unspecified code are to the Penal Code.) We shall reverse the judgment of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Thomas A. Warren, John L. Warren, Jr., Des. E. Schick and David DefinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. Pompa-OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. Pimentel CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
- People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985