Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 15, 1935No. Docket No. 46342Published

Where, under state law and court decisions, an officer of a municipality is not legally entitled to receive compensation in excess of a definitely fixed sum and where no showing is made as to the degree of direction and control exercised by the village board, held, compensation in excess of the fixed monthly compensation is not exempt from Federal taxation as compensation of an officer or employee of a political subdivision.

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE M. STEVENS, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Stevens v. Commissioner

Docket No. 46342.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

31 B.T.A. 1035; 1935 BTA LEXIS 1031;

January 15, 1935, Promulgated

Where, under state law and court decisions, an officer of a municipality is not legally entitled to receive compensation in excess of a definitely fixed sum and where no showing is made as to the degree of direction and control exercised by the village board, held, compensation in excess of the fixed monthly compensation is not exempt from Federal taxation as compensation of an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stevens v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API