Legal Opinion

Meisenheimer v. DAC Vision Incorporated

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 4, 2019No. 3:19-cv-01422Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION DAVID MEISENHEIMER, § § Plaintiff, § § V. § No. 3:19-cv-1422-M § DAC VISION INCORPORATED, § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH DEPOSITION NOTICES1 Defendant DAC Vision Incorporated has filed a Motion to Quash Deposition Notices, see Dkt. No. 13, asking the Court to “quash [Plaintiff David Meisenheimer’s] September 6, 2019 Notice of Oral and Videotaped Deposition of Corporate Representative of DAC Vision, Incorporated and Plaintiff’s October 29, 2019 Notice of Oral and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. HuttingerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re Terra International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. BDO USA, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API