V. E. M. Hotel Service, Inc. v. Uline, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
These are consolidated appeals, the first, No. 3133, from a judgment upon a jury verdict for Uline, Inc., and the second, No. 3143, from a summary judgment for Uline, Inc., based upon the doctrine of res judicata.
No. 3133
Uline sued V.E.M. to recover damages for expenses incurred in the construction of a ■checkroom in reliance upon representations by V.E.M. that it would operate it and pay Uline $4,000 in six instalments, or, in the alternative, for four instalments of rent then due under the agreement with V.E.M. for the operation of the checkroom.
After instructions…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Woods v. CannadayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Comer v. FistereDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Cope Ford, Inc. v. LastfogelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wheeler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- American Marietta Co. v. GriffinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
- Adams v. Jonathan Woodner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matthew A. Welch & Sons, Inc. v. BirdDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.