Legal Opinion

Nickel v. Hinz

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 27, 1941No. 29955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff Nickel brought this action in ejectment, claiming title to the land involved by purchase from Equitable Life Assurance Society, which acquired title by mortgage foreclosure. Defendants in the instant case were also defendants in the foreclosure proceedings. From a verdict and judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff makes several contentions, but we find it necessary to consider only one, that the trial court erred in overruling plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict.

The evidence of plaintiff that he had purchased the property from the Equitable on December 20, 1937,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  3. Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Baker v. Haswell TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Bonicamp v. StarbuckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. GerardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Trillium Transportation Fuels LLC v. Integral Energy LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API