Legal Opinion

Grubert v. Cosmopolitan National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 9, 1995No. 2-94-0384PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis

Defendants, Cosmopolitan National Bank of Chicago (Cosmopolitan) and Juliette Kevorkian, are mortgagors of real property that was purchased by the plaintiffs-mortgagees, Gordon J. and Susan Grubert, at a judicially ordered foreclosure sale. The other named defendants failed to appear and were subsequently defaulted.

On appeal, defendants argue that the trial court’s order confirming the sale improperly reduced the price which plaintiffs bid for the property at the sheriff’s sale. Plaintiffs argue that the order was proper because defendants consented to the price reduction. We reverse the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Abbott v. BeebeIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People Ex Rel. Fahner v. Colorado City Lot Owners & Taxpayers Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Blancett v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kandalepas v. EconomouAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Norma I. Colon, Debtor-Appellant v. Option One Mortgage Corporation, And/or Its AssignsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. DealeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc. v. EspinozaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Christian v. Citibank, F.S.B.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Commercial Credit Loans, Inc. v. EspinozaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API