Javier Tapia v. Naphcare Inc., et al.

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 JAVIER TAPIA, CASE NO. C22-1141-KKE 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEY’S FEES 10 NAPHCARE INC., et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Javier Tapia’s renewed motion for attorney’s fees. Dkt. No. 13 350. The matter is now ripe for consideration. See Dkt. Nos. 350, 356, 357. For the reasons 14 below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 In 2021, Tapia sued both Pierce County and NaphCare, Inc. (“NaphCare”), a private 17 company contracted to provide…