Legal Opinion

Nadal v. City of New York

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 27, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWendel, J.

The action is brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of Julius Silver, assignee of Frank I. O’Neil, to recover salary claimed to be due O’Neil by the defendant. The facts, which are not substantially disputed, are as follows: In May, 1922, Frank I. O’Neil was appointed an attendant of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York. On May 1,1931, he was wrongfully and illegally suspended from duty, without pay, by the board *401of judges of said court. Subsequently and on or about May 30, 1932, the board of judges of said court, by resolution, voluntarily reinstated O’Neill as such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. Standard Chemicals & Metals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. People, Ex Rel. Ryan v. . FrenchNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Sweeny v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teamsters Local 331 v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API