Miller v. Kimber
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err by giving a missing witness charge. A missing witness charge is appropriate when a party fails to call a witness who is within his control and who would be in a position to give substantial, noncumulative testimony (Mashley v Kerr, 47 NY2d 892; Getlin v St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Center, 117 AD2d 707, 709; Chandler v Flynn, 111 AD2d 300, appeal dismissed 67 NY2d 647). The fact that portions of the missing witness’s records were received into evidence did not render his testimony cumulative (see, Safdie v City…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chandler v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Getlin v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mashley v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Stein v. Lebowitz-Pine View Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Safdie v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dukes v. RotemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Arpino v. LombardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995