Legal Opinion

Miller v. Kimber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err by giving a missing witness charge. A missing witness charge is appropriate when a party fails to call a witness who is within his control and who would be in a position to give substantial, noncumulative testimony (Mashley v Kerr, 47 NY2d 892; Getlin v St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Center, 117 AD2d 707, 709; Chandler v Flynn, 111 AD2d 300, appeal dismissed 67 NY2d 647). The fact that portions of the missing witness’s records were received into evidence did not render his testimony cumulative (see, Safdie v City…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. FlynnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Getlin v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Mashley v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Stein v. Lebowitz-Pine View Hotel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Safdie v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dukes v. RotemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Arpino v. LombardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API