Legal Opinion

Hannebaum v. Estate of Chrisman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1986No. 51199PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Attorneys representing contingent re-mainderman under a residuary testamentary trust sought an allowance from the estate for fees and reimbursement of expenses. The trial court found the requested amounts to be reasonable but denied the petition for allowance. Remainderman joins his attorneys in this appeal. We reverse.

Petitioner Jack Hannebaum is a contingent remainderman under a residuary trust established by the will of his uncle, Merrill W. Chrisman (decedent). Decedent executed his will September 1, 1979, and died September 22, 1979. The will creates a marital trust and a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jesser v. Mayfair Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Trautz v. LempSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Nelson v. Mercantile Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. In Re Estate of MurrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Coates v. CoatesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Feinberg v. Adolph K. Feinberg Hotel TrustMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. DCW Enterprises, Inc. v. Terre Du Lac Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. In Re KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. In re Estate of MortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API