Legal Opinion
Mendes v. Jednak
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 22, 2000No. 3:96CV2371 (WWE)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Susan B. Mendes, Anthony Mendes and Joseph Doran bring this action against the defendants, Michael Jed-nak and Saint Joseph College, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), the Employment Retirement Income Securities Act (“ERISA”) and a variety of other state law causes of action.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, the defendants move for summary judgment on eleven counts of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Kathleen Borkowski v. Valley Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Haag v. MVP Health CareDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2012
- Stamey v. NYP Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Cintrón-Serrano v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Slim v. Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2025