George Mitchell v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
George Mitchell brought this action to establish his right to employment as Executive Director of the Community Action Agency of the City of Minneapolis. He claimed that he had a contract with the Board of Directors of the Agency hiring him as its Executive Director, and that the City and its Council were interfering with his contractual rights. The complaint was based on two theories: (1) the law of Minnesota, including the common law of contracts and a resolution of the City Council of the City of Minneapolis, and (2) the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court 1…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Wilfred H. VANCE, Appellee, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- R.W. Murray, Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Chemical Bank v. Sigrist (In Re Sigrist)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- Executive Financial Services, Inc. v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- John T. Tharalson, and Cross v. Pfizer Genetics, Inc., a Corporation, and CrossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.