Legal Opinion

Conner v. Downes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Newton. Tried below before Hon. N. P. Nicks.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS.

GARRETT, Chief Justice.

—The appellee Downes has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this case because the transcript is not authenticated by the seal of the clerk of the trial court in the manner required by law, in that it is not fastened together and sealed over the tie with the seal of the court. This is required by rule 90 of the Rules for District and County Courts. An inspection of the transcript shows that the sheets of paper are fastened together at the upper end with tape, and that two paper seals have been pasted together over the tie, but that the seal of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. LeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Mays v. ForbesTexas Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Industrial Transp. Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Elliott v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. McNaley v. SealyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API