Legal Opinion

Cecil Z. v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 14, 2025No. 3:24-cv-10936Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Cecil Z., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24-10936 (RK) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, OPINION Defendant. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Cecil Z.’s1 (“Cecil” or “Plaintiff”) appeal from the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) final decision, which denied Cecil’s request for Social Security disability insurance benefits. (ECF No. 1.) The Court has jurisdiction to review this appeal under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and reaches its decision without oral argument…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API