Palmer v. Sunshine Family Laundry Service Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In this trespass action the plaintiff sought damages resulting from the collision of his automobile with a truck of the defendant in the intersection of two streets in Pittsburgh. The verdict of the jury was for the defendant on á specific finding that plaintiff w;as guilty of contributory negligence. Plaintiff’s appeal is from the refusal of a new trial.
There is no merit in plaintiff’s complaint- here made for the first time that he was prejudiced when his case was called for trial late in the afternoon of- February 15, 1954 and he was required to proceed. Thére was still time…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Albert v. Schenley Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Steele v. FranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Dandridge v. Exhibitors Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Snyder v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3Cited by3 opinions
- Halpern v. Western Pennsylvania Chemical Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Penner v. NapolitanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Madera v. KesterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956